Characterization of Asynchronous Telemedice Consultation for Pulmonology In Colombia

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/049

Characterization of Asynchronous Telemedice Consultation for Pulmonology In Colombia

  • Henry Robayo Amórtegui 1*
  • Alirio Bastidas Goyes 2
  • Julián Monroy Tovar 1
  • Britt Whitaker 3

1Physician, Universidad de la Sabana, Colombia.
2Pulmonary specialist, Universidad de la Sabana, Colombia.
3Family medicine resident, Universidad de la Sabana, Colombia.

*Corresponding Author: Henry Robayo Amórtegui, Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia

Citation: Henry Robayo Amórtegui, Alirio Bastidas Goyes, Julián Monroy Tovar, Britt Whitaker (2020) Characterization Of Asynchronous Telemedice Consultation For Pulmonology In Colombia J Clinical Research and Reports, 4(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/049

Copyright: © 2020 Henry Robayo Amórtegui. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 17 February 2020 | Accepted: 05 March 2020 | Published: 18 March 2020

Keywords: pulmonary disease; pulmonary telemedicine; remote consultation; rural health services; telemedicine; telehealth

Abstract

Background: Among the modalities of asynchronous telemedicine used in Colombia, there exists the teleconcepto, through which a medical response from a specialist is provided within certain time. Currently, there is no data about the characteristics of teleconceptos directed to the pulmonology service.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out to identify the characteristics of teleconceptos aimed at pulmonology. Data was obtained from the clinical record of each teleconcepto, taking into account date and time of the request, vital signs, ICD-10 diagnosis, present illness, and the reason for consultation, as well as date and time of response from pulmonology and type of recommendation, either a diagnosis or a treatment. Subsequently, the frequency and the percentage of the qualitative, quantitative, average and standard deviation variables were described.

Results: 766 teleconceptos were studied, the mean age was 60 years. The cities with the highest number of requests were Ibague (7.4%) and Bogotá (7.3%). Mainly reported symptoms in the present illness were dyspnea (47%) and coughing (44.1%); the main preceding condition associated with pulmonary pathology was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (31.6%).

Conclusions: Coughing and dyspnea were the most frequently found symptoms in the patients referred to pulmonology by teleconcepto and COPD was the preceeding condition which was most frequently associated with pulmonary pathology. On the other hand, spirometry and flow-volume curve were the most requested tests by the physician and the pulmonologist. Finally, the average time in hours from the request to the teleconcepto response was 9.1 hours.

Introduction

The increase of population worldwide and their allocation in remote areas are two factors which have brought certain difficulties for health services coverage (1). According to data from the World Health Organization (WHO), between 2000 and 2009, in average, there were 13 physicians per 10.000 habitants in the world. Countries which are considered to lead healthcare services worldwide, such as Canada, register an average of 19 physicians per 10.000 habitants. Great Britain and Cuba have 27.03 and 67.23 physicians per 10.000 habitants, respectively. Colombia, specifically, has an average of 14 physicians per 10.000 habitants, with the professionals located mostly in urban areas (2).

On the other hand, there is a lack of specialists in urban and rural areas. Pulmonology solely has a record of 350 Pneumologists in Colombia, having an average is of 0.75 specialized professionals per 100.000 habitants (3,4), making it even more difficult to attend to all patients. Furthermore, a greater number of specialists concentrate in the major cities of the country, which leaves many zones uncovered (5).

This situation has proven to be one of the causes of shortfalls and delays in assistance for specialized medicine in the region. However, the use of technology in telemedicine might offer different kinds of solutions to these issues.  Among its advantages, telemedicine permits the patient improved accessibility to specialised medical attention. According to Colombia’s Ministery of Health and Social Protection, Telemedicine activities are carried through exchange of information of health professionals their patients’ health status. Modalities are in-person, synchronous or asynchronous. According to regulations, providers have been classified as centros de referencia providers (referring centers), that is, those institutions who can offer support to both primary and complex attention. Another type of providers are prestadores remisores (referring providers), which are the institutions that have certain limitations in their service coverage in terms of technology or accessibility to obtain a patient’s diagnosis (6).

Colombia has 282 sites as referring centers and 443 telemedicine referring telemedicine providers, which are scattered in cities and townships. Using this resource also shortens the waiting time for answers regarding a specialized medical opinion, the average waiting time being 41.58 hours for an appointment in telemedicine for referring centers and 23,95 hours for referring providers (6).

Additionally, telemedicine is profitable in terms of cost saving: expenses for a patient who is served through telemedicine are 313 US, whilst expenses for a patient who attends an appointment in person are 585 US (7). There is also a saving on an additional expense about keeping a medical specialization in healthcare service centers, which is estimated to cost about 1166 US per patient (8).

Among the modalities of telemedicine used in Colombia, there exists the teleconcepto, a resource from asynchronous telemedicine (time measured in hours, starting from initial medical inquiry to specialized medical response) (1). We define it as an activity carried out remotely to request formal medical specialized opinion, having previously exchanged valid information (digital clinical record). The exchange is done between a physician in charge of primary care and a specialist, throughout the use of information and communication technologies, in order to improve a patient’s medical condition. In October 2010, French health authorities decreed 5 different types of medical procedures which are part of the concept of telemedicine, teleexpertise being a similar option as the one implemented in Colombia (9).

The method of teleconcepto is carried out throughout easy-access technological elements, such as desk computers or laptops, or mobile devices and tablets, in order to establish contact between the expert and the physician who is attending the patient. That way, it is possible to offer more tools for diagnosis, treatment and forecasting of certain types of pathologies. Currently, there is no data regarding the characteristics of teleconcepto consultation to pneumology requested by primary medical attention. This paper has set the objective of describing teleconceptos for pneumology service through healthcare service providing institutions (HSPI) in Colombia.

Method

A cross-sectional study was carried out to identify the characteristics of pneumology-related teleconceptos. Data was obtained from the database of a Colombian HSPI which is specialized in telemedicine and offers the service of teleconcepto nationwide. The requests are referred to their office in Bogota throughout a program specialized in clinical records. On the other hand, the referring centers are placed nationwide in institutions of first and second level of medical attention. Most of them are run by primary attention physicians. They start their query for a teleconcepto to pneumology by writing a new medical record in a computer. 

Data collection was made by analyzing each of the teleconceptos directed to pulmonology from February 1st to April 30th in 2016. After that, to-be analyzed characteristics were selected; in order to minimize any typing errors, the research team verified the data twice. Any kind of teleconcepto directed to pneumology was included, patients were required to be older than 15. Teleconceptos directed to any other specialization were discarded, as well as those required by mistake.

A Pneumologist gives an opinion based on the data reported by the clinical record, the physical examination, para-clinical tests and any other tests from the physician in charge of the patient. To provide an answer for the teleconcepto, the specialist must write their opinion, which should be no more than 500 words, according to the regulations for clinical records. For this reason, said response must include clear indications on the procedures for the patients.

The factors that were evaluated were personal information, date and time of the teleconcepto requirement, vital signs, CIE-10 diagnosis, current disease and reason for requesting a teleconcepto. In terms of the request as such, the evaluated variables were the following: general request (purpose of inquire is not determined), treatment, diagnostic approach, radiological findings, abnormal para-clinical tests, proceedings and prognosis. Finally, in terms of the reaction from pneumology, the following factors were studied: follow-up, diagnosis test, treatment, para-clinical tests request, diagnostic imaging, in-person pneumology assessment, referral to emergency, proceedings, and the date and time of the teleconcepto response from the specialty.

Calculations for the size of the sample

The calculations to obtain the sample size were made with Epidat, Pan American Health Organization’s free program. Through the formulas, a confidence interval was estimated for a 5% of absolute precision and a maximum estimated proportion of 50%. Thus, at least 462 teleconceptos were needed. A convenience sampling was carried out and it included all teleconceptos obtained during February, March and April of 2016.

Data management and statistical analysis

A description of the variables was carried out firstly, to acknowledge and exclude those variables with a loss of information 20% higher than the data. Then, the description covered frequency and percentage of qualitative factors, as well as measures of central tendency and dispersion for quantitative data. If their distribution was normal or median, only mean o and standard deviation were included. If their distribution did not meet normality criteria, interquartile rank was included as well. An estimation on the proportion and confidence interval were made about the ten most frequent diseases that required a teleconcepto. Data was managed and analyzed with the use of the program SPSS v23.

Results

Data entry and healthcare centers that requested a teleconcepto

Figure 1 describes entry of the reported teleconceptos in a period of three months. 820 teleconceptos in total were revised, out of which 54 were excluded, most of them, due to being considered as redirected to other specialties, since there were no respiratory pathologies. Two of the teleconceptos were for patients under 15 years old, thus, a pediatric assessment was demanded. In total, 766 teleconceptos were chosen for the final analysis.

Figure 1: Design of the study

Referral centers were found nationwide in both urban and rural areas (Figure 2). Teleconceptos coming from 140 townships and the capital district in Colombia were demanded. The rate of requirements, as defined per city, were: Ibague (7.4%), Bogota (7.3%), Cucuta (5.7%), Tunja (4.6%), Medellin (3.7%), and Pereira (3.7%). On the other hand, the highest frequency of requirements was held in Dosquebradas (3.3%) (Located in Risaralda) and Chinchina (2.7) (Located in Caldas).

Figure 2: Nationwide locations of the referring centers for teleconceptos

Characteristics of the population

Mean age was 60 years old, the minimum being 15 and the maximum 98 (IQR:24). Out of all the assessed teleconceptos, 425 patients were women (55.5%). The record of participation in any assistance program for chronical pathologies was 80%. Cardiac frequency was reported in 92.5% of the cases, as well as systolic pressure. Diastolic arterial pressure was taken in 95.3% of the cases, respiratory frequency in 93.1% of them, temperature in 82% of them, and oximetry in 5% of the cases. Pulmonary auscultation was reported in 19.5% of the cases (149 patients), out of which 76% had some abnormality.

The physicians who wrote the clinical record described the reason for consultation in 0.5% of the cases. Symptoms during consultation were mainly dyspnea (47%), coughing (44.1%), fever (23%), chest pain (11.4%) and asthenia (5%). On the other hand, symptoms that appeared less frequently (in less than 5% of the cases) were intense headache, symptoms related to sleep apnea (apnea, snoring, insomnia and daytime hyperinsomnia), wheezing, loss weight, runny nose, dysphonia, hemoptysis, odynophagia, and others. Table 1 describes the general characteristics of the population.

Most of the reported preceding conditions related to pulmonary disease were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with a rate of 31.6%, followed by smoking (15.9%), asthma (11.4%), obstructive sleep apnea (8.2%), tuberculosis (7.4%), pulmonary hypertension (5.6%) and pneumonia. On the other hand, one preceding condition unrelated to pulmonary disease was high blood pressure (HBP) in 31. 7% of the population (Table 1).

Characteristics of the population and referring site of the teleconcepto
Table 1: Characteristics of the population and referring site of the teleconcepto

 

Diagnosis related to CIE-10 which were more frequently reported to pulmonary pathology were COPD (19.1%), asthma (6.9%), sleep apnea (6%) and coughing (2.5%). The most frequent of non-pulmonary pathologies are cardiovascular diseases (cardiopathies, systemic arterial hypertension, and others) in a 11.9%.

Requested para-clinical exams before and after the teleconcepto

Paraclínicos requested by the doctor before establishing a teleconcepto were mainly the following: Chest X-ray (46.5%), followed by spirometry test (31.5%), blood test (21.1%), microscopy (17.4%), echocardiogram (13.6%), arterial blood gas analysis (8.7%) and polysomnography (8.5%). In terms of pneumology, suggested testing was for: spirometry (61.4%), arterial blood gas analysis (33.8%), blood test (31.7%), chest computerized axial tomography (22.5%), chest X-ray (19.6%), transthoracic echocardiogram (18.61%), microscopy (16.7%), immunoglobulin E test (9.7%) and polysomnography (7.8%). Para-clinical tests required per specialty are summarized in (Table 2).

Examinations requested before the teleconcepto
Table 2: Characteristics of para-clinical examinations of the teleconcepto

Reason for requesting a teleconcepto, response time and type of answer from pneumology

General inquiry refers to a request to the specialty about guidance for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Out of all the requests for teleconcepto, 58.5% was for a general inquiry. 31.3% was for treatment; 15.7% was for diagnostic focus; 11.1 was for X-ray findings; 9.7% was for abnormal findings in para-clinical examinations, 0.8% was to establish any additional procedures (such as fibreoptic bronchoscopy); and 0.1% was for prognosis.

Table 3: Characteristics of the reason for requesting a teleconcepto 

Month, day, year and time of request are reported in the clinical record of a teleconcepto. Date and time of the response from the pneumologist are also included. According to the analyzed data, the average of answering time for the teleconcepto was 9,1 hours. The indications provided by the response were: patient follow-up with a new assessment (78,5%), diagnostic test (72,8%), treatment (59,7%), extra pulmonary para-clinical examinations (59,4%), X-rays (46,9%), in-person assessment by a pneumologist, and surgical or non-surgical procedure (8,4%). The following table (Table 4) contains indications once the answer is provided from the specialty.

Table 4: Characteristics of indications in teleconcepto

Discussion

The present study carries out the first nationwide description of the main characteristics of the request for specialized guidance to pneumology by using the method of asynchronous teleconcepto. Findings reveal that the main preceding condition for assistance in primary care was COPD, smoking, asthma, sleep apnea and tuberculosis. These pulmonary diseases are the main cause of medical consultation for respiratory pathologies in consultation in Colombia (3, 10, 11).

Elderly people (plus 60 years) are the ones who most frequently undergo specialized consultation. The mainly reported symptoms were coughing and dyspnea, which matches the first report from Colombia’s National Health Watch that assures respiratory diseases, specially COPD, have a higher prevalence and mortality rate in those older than 60 years old (11). Coughing and dyspnea are the most frequently reported symptoms by the general population. Dyspnea’s frequency being about 8,9% in general population; the percentage might even raise to 35% in people older than 65 years (12, 13). According to data from America, coughing is found in 18% of the population (14).

Smoking is still one of the main previous conditions found in those patients with respiratory abnormalities in our environment. Well known and reported, this situation associates cigarettes with a risk for developing COPD (RR:4.01), asthma (RR:1.61), sleep apnea (RR:1.97) and tuberculosis (RR:1.57) (15). The latter, which has the fifth place in our results, is similarly reported by the WHO in 2015 as part of Colombia being one of the countries with a high incidence of tuberculosis (16). The relevance of knowing about the behavior of these diseases lies in the fact that respiratory diseases in Colombia are ranked as the third cause of mortality (17). For this reason, it is necessary to keep on researching new ways for having an accurate and early reaction to them.

Our research evaluated teleconceptos sent around the whole country (Figure 1). The study of locations found the most frequent city to ask for teleconceptos to be Ibague (7.4%), followed in second place by Bogota (7.3%). Nonetheless, summed percentages of the capital cities represent only 33% of the total number of requests. Indeed, 67% of the requests come from small cities and townships with rural areas. It was expected to obtain such results, since this method might have a higher demand from the outskirts from the country, where there is not enough access to specialized consultation, although the prevalence of respiratory diseases remains important. 

Figure 1 portrays also the differences between certain regions of the country in terms of their requirement for a teleconcepto. Northern, Western and Central regions are where teleconcepto is more frequently summoned. On the contrary, Southern and Eastern regions have a very low rate of requirements for teleconcepto, almost none in the latter. This situation could be related to the availability of this resource, which depends on the health service institution that actually provide said service. Other factors considered are the easiness or difficulties implied in access to information technology (IT) and the internet access (6). 

Ibague and Bogota were the main cities that required concepts from pneumology, possibly due to various factors, such as having better accessibility to IT and communication technologies and a higher population density, which translates into a higher number of patients with complex pathologies, and possibly factors like smoking and pollution. Resarch by the WHO about pollution in Bogota reveal that the city is considered one of the cities with the highest level of pollution in South America. The mean concentration of particulate matter from less than 10 ug (PM10) was 52 ug/m3, the expected measure was 32 ug/m3. The concentration in 2,5 ug (PM 2,5) was 24 ug/m3, although the expected measure for this kind was less than 10 ug/m3 (18, 19). Said findings suggest that Bogota fails to comply with the recommendations for protection of the population, given that pollution is a decisive factor for the development of respiratory diseases and an additional reason to receive a higher number of requirements for teleconceptos for pneumology.

Pulmonary auscultation was only reported in 19% of the teleconceptos, and it was found to be abnormal in 76% of the cases. This data shows that the physician who requests for a teleconcepto must emphasize in a better detailed report of the physical examination, since it can offer more information to indicate a better diagnosis and treatment for the patient.

The most frequently reported para-clinical examination by the physician are chest X-ray (46.5%), spirometry and flow-volume curve (31.5%), complete blood count (21.1%), arterial gas (8.7%) and polysomnography (8.5%). The high frequency in chest X-ray requirements might be connected to the easiness to access it in primary care. However, other examinations would be suggested as well for a diagnostic focus on respiratory pathologies, and they are not seen as frequently in the clinical records of a doctor who required teleconcepto. This might represent the limitations regarding the requests for para-clinical examinations in our healthcare service (availability in facilities or approval from the institutions) and the lack of knowledge in terms of approach for certain diseases and their symptoms.

Para-clinical testing required by the pneumology service are spirometry and flow-volume curve (61.3%), arterial gas (33.8%), blood count (31.7%), chest CT scan (22.5%), chest X-ray (19.6%) and transthoracic echocardiography (18.1%). The reason why spirometry is the most frequently requested examination by the speciality might be related to the fact that it has been reported as subtilized in primary care in patients suspected to have pulmonary disease (20). CT scan is frequently employed for a specialized approach on treating parenchymatous pulmonary diseases. Transthoracic echocardiography is used for diagnosing cardiac diseases which might be related to respiratory conditions or symptoms.

Regarding the teleconcepto requirement itself, most of the general physicians do not ask a specific question, but they ask for a general assessment of their patient. Then the pneumologist provides a general answer to the teleconcepto, usually making an emphasis in follow-up and diagnostic testing in 70% of the cases, and in treatment in 60% of the cases. In-person assessment was requested in 31% of the cases, and this number reflects that not all the pneumology cases can be resolved through the method of teleconcepto. 

Guidance might be provided through teleconcepto to any physician, in order to carry out supported follow-up in patients with chronical pathology, and to suggest in-person specialized assessment when needed. Mean answering time of teleconcepto is 9.1 hours. According to data obtained in a Colombian context for telemedicine, the average response time is 41.58 hours for referring centers and 23.96 hours for referring healthcare service providers. Thus, the method of teleconcepto allows the physician to quickly obtain a concept from a specialist. 

The present research could not carry out an analysis of cost-effectiveness or satisfaction level from the patients assessed by telemedicine. Even though it might offer certain benefits, current research does not demonstrate significant statistical data about life quality, an improvement on mortality rates or cost-effectiveness for the main chronical diseases (8). Nonetheless, since specialized literature holds few studies about this topic, it is indeed necessary to have a higher amount of them in terms of the three characteristics.  

One of the advantages of telemedicine has been being able to reduce geographical distances, as well as the waiting time for patients who are under different circumstances which impedes them to promptly access medical healthcare services (1). However, utilizing this resource may bring other benefits, such as obtaining information about the conditions or diseases which may need more support or guidance from specialized physicians to those giving primary care.

Conclusion

Telemedicine in Colombia might be presented as a solution to the lack of specialists in areas that are difficult to reach. Thanks to teleconcepto, it is possible to obtain a veredict from specialized medicine in a timely manner; the average time between request and answer is 9,1 hours, according to our analysis.

Pulmonary pathologies have a high prevalence worldwide, since they account for high morbility and mortality rates. For this reason, when physicians get more orientation on their medical focus, it is possible to achieve efficient medical healthcare access for patients who have difficulties in attending in-person consultation. High levels of ambient air pollution in urban areas is also associates to a higher prevalence of pulmonary pathologies.

Ethical responsibilities

People and animal protection: The authors declare that the present study did not involve experiments with human beings or animals.

Data privacy:  The authors declare they have followed all the protocols about patient data management provided by their work centers.

Funding

The authors were completely responsible for the funding of this research.

 

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.

img

Virginia E. Koenig

Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.

img

Delcio G Silva Junior

Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.

img

Ziemlé Clément Méda

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mina Sherif Soliman Georgy

We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.

img

Layla Shojaie

The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.

img

Sing-yung Wu

Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.

img

Orlando Villarreal

Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.

img

Katarzyna Byczkowska

Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.

img

Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.

img

Pedro Marques Gomes

Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.

img

Bernard Terkimbi Utoo

This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.

img

Prof Sherif W Mansour

Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

img

Hao Jiang

As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.

img

Raed Mualem

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.

img

Andreas Filippaios

Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.

img

Dr Suramya Dhamija

Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.

img

Bruno Chauffert

I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!

img

Baheci Selen

"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".

img

Jesus Simal-Gandara

I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.

img

Douglas Miyazaki

We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.

img

Dr Griffith

I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.

img

Dr Tong Ming Liu

I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.

img

Husain Taha Radhi

I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.

img

S Munshi

Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.

img

Tania Munoz

“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.

img

George Varvatsoulias

Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.

img

Rui Tao

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.

img

Khurram Arshad

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.

img

Gomez Barriga Maria Dolores

The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.

img

Lin Shaw Chin

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.

img

Maria Dolores Gomez Barriga

Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.

img

Dr Maria Dolores Gomez Barriga

Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.

img

Dr Maria Regina Penchyna Nieto

Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.

img

Dr Marcelo Flavio Gomes Jardim Filho

Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”

img

Zsuzsanna Bene

Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner

img

Dr Susan Weiner

My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.

img

Lin-Show Chin

My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.

img

Sonila Qirko

My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.

img

Luiz Sellmann